Contested Rule Formation and Institutional Mismatch
A framework for early-phase governance of disruptive innovations, focusing on classification, jurisdiction, venue settlement, and procedural rule formation.
Learn more →My research examines how emerging technologies and sustainability transitions become governable when inherited institutions do not yet fit new policy problems. I study the upstream phase of governance; when actors are still deciding what a new problem is, who has authority over it, where decisions should be made, and what procedural rules can make governance accountable, reviewable, and durable.
Across AI governance, autonomous systems, AI infrastructure, clean energy transitions, collaborative governance, and nonprofit/civil society action, I analyze how rules, venues, administrative routines, and interResearch Noteries shape whether governance stabilizes, stalls, shifts venues, or consolidates without meaningful learning.
I focus on the politics of making an innovation governable before mature policy conflict fully exists.
A framework for early-phase governance of disruptive innovations, focusing on classification, jurisdiction, venue settlement, and procedural rule formation.
Learn more →Institutional readiness, accountability lag, and procedural governance for AI, autonomous systems, and digital infrastructures.
Learn more →Where governance actually lands in clean energy transitions under preemption, utility authority, and constrained polycentricity.
Learn more →How nonprofits and communities make emerging problems governable through interResearch Notetion, venue activation, and rule-object production.
Learn more →Methods to study institutional change, attention reallocation, and design–implementation gaps in complex governance systems.
Learn more →I use qualitative case analysis, process tracing, documentary analysis, structured comparison, mixed methods, text-as-data, and systems modeling to make governance empirically observable through rules, venues, routines, and accountability.
I am an incoming tenure-track Assistant Professor of Public Administration at The University of Texas at Tyler, beginning Fall 2026, and a PhD candidate in Public Administration and Policy at Florida State University.
My research sits at the intersection of public administration, policy process, science, technology, and environmental policy, urban governance, nonprofit studies, collaborative governance, and institutional design.
My work develops Contested Rule Formation to explain how actors classify new problems, settle authority, build venues, and create procedural rules before stable policy systems fully exist.
Across projects, I focus on how governance becomes empirically visible: in rule objects, venue architectures, public records, procurement templates, program manuals, administrative routines, reporting obligations, and procedures for review and correction.
The agenda connects CRF, AI governance, clean-energy rule location, nonprofit shadow rule-making, collaborative governance attention budgets, and systems modeling of design–implementation gaps.
A short explanation of CRF as the politics of making an innovation governable before mature policy conflict fully exists.
A public-administration explanation of institutional readiness, venue settlement, and procedural governance for public-sector AI.
A reflection on eligibility rules, documentation burdens, and downstream program templates as surfaces of energy-justice institutionalization.
I welcome conversations about research collaboration, public administration and policy scholarship, AI governance, clean energy transitions, nonprofit and civil society governance, and speaking or teaching opportunities.
Email: sjangjoo@fsu.edu · Google Scholar · CV