Research

Upstream governance, institutional mismatch, and rule formation in emerging technology and sustainability transitions.

My research examines how emerging technologies and sustainability transitions become governable when inherited institutions do not yet fit new policy problems. I study the upstream phase of governance; when actors are still deciding what a new problem is, who has authority over it, where decisions should be made, and what procedural rules can make governance accountable, reviewable, and durable.

Across AI governance, autonomous systems, AI infrastructure, clean energy transitions, collaborative governance, and nonprofit/civil society action, I analyze how rules, venues, administrative routines, and interResearch Noteries shape whether governance stabilizes, stalls, shifts venues, or consolidates without meaningful learning.

I focus on the politics of making an innovation governable before mature policy conflict fully exists.

Research Areas

Contested rule formation icon
01

Contested Rule Formation and Institutional Mismatch

A framework for early-phase governance of disruptive innovations, focusing on classification, jurisdiction, venue settlement, and procedural rule formation.

Learn more
AI and technology governance icon
02

AI and Emerging Technology Governance

Institutional readiness, accountability lag, and procedural governance for AI, autonomous systems, and digital infrastructures.

Learn more
Clean energy governance icon
03

Clean Energy, Rule Location, and Constrained Polycentricity

Where governance actually lands in clean energy transitions under preemption, utility authority, and constrained polycentricity.

Learn more
Civil society and nonprofits icon
04

Civil Society, Nonprofits, and Shadow Rule-Making

How nonprofits and communities make emerging problems governable through interResearch Notetion, venue activation, and rule-object production.

Learn more
Collaborative governance icon
05

Collaborative Governance and Design Methods

Methods to study institutional change, attention reallocation, and design–implementation gaps in complex governance systems.

Learn more
Methods and evidence compass icon

Methods and Evidence

I use qualitative case analysis, process tracing, documentary analysis, structured comparison, mixed methods, text-as-data, and systems modeling to make governance empirically observable through rules, venues, routines, and accountability.

View Research Approach
About

Sina Jangjoo

I am an incoming tenure-track Assistant Professor of Public Administration at The University of Texas at Tyler, beginning Fall 2026, and a PhD candidate in Public Administration and Policy at Florida State University.

My research sits at the intersection of public administration, policy process, science, technology, and environmental policy, urban governance, nonprofit studies, collaborative governance, and institutional design.

Identity

How new problems become governable

My work develops Contested Rule Formation to explain how actors classify new problems, settle authority, build venues, and create procedural rules before stable policy systems fully exist.

ClassificationVenue SettlementProcedural GovernanceRules-in-Use

Research approach

Across projects, I focus on how governance becomes empirically visible: in rule objects, venue architectures, public records, procurement templates, program manuals, administrative routines, reporting obligations, and procedures for review and correction.

Current agenda

The agenda connects CRF, AI governance, clean-energy rule location, nonprofit shadow rule-making, collaborative governance attention budgets, and systems modeling of design–implementation gaps.

Research Notes

Research Note

What Is Contested Rule Formation?

A short explanation of CRF as the politics of making an innovation governable before mature policy conflict fully exists.

AI Governance

Why AI Readiness Is Not the Same as AI Adoption

A public-administration explanation of institutional readiness, venue settlement, and procedural governance for public-sector AI.

Energy Justice

Where Does Energy Justice Become a Rule?

A reflection on eligibility rules, documentation burdens, and downstream program templates as surfaces of energy-justice institutionalization.

Contact

I welcome conversations about research collaboration, public administration and policy scholarship, AI governance, clean energy transitions, nonprofit and civil society governance, and speaking or teaching opportunities.

Email: sjangjoo@fsu.edu   ·   Google Scholar   ·   CV